Open
letter to Subsidiary Body of the Convention on Biological Diversity
demanding a ban on the release of genetically engineered trees
By
WRM
20 February, Rome, Italy
On 19 February 2008, a large number of civil society organizations
sent an open letter to the Convention on Biological Diversity?s Subsidiary
Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, currently
meeting in Rome, expressing their "deep concern" about genetic
engineering of trees.
In only one week, the letter was signed by 138 organizations in countries
where research on the genetic engineering of trees is being carried
out, (or has in recent years). Those countries are: Aotearoa / New
Zealand, Australia, Belgium Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Finland,
France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Poland, Portugal , Spain, Sweden, The
Netherlands, United Kingdom and USA.
The signatories begin by stating that their "concern is based
on the fact that the genetic manipulation being undertaken is aimed
at consolidating and further expanding a model of monoculture tree
plantations that has already proven to result in serious social and
environmental impacts in many of our countries."
The letter provides a number of examples on how current research would
impact on the environment, given that trees are being genetically
manipulated for:
- faster tree growth, which would "further aggravate the proven
impacts on water resources" since it which would mean "even
greater consumption of water by tree plantations".
- resistance to cold temperatures -for the purpose of planting trees
in colder regions and at higher altitudes in the mountains- that "would
lead to social and environmental impacts in regions that until now
have not been affected by the impacts of current tree monocultures."
- trees with insecticide properties to make them resistant to insects,
that "could result in the death of a large number of other insect
species, with consequent impacts on local fauna?s food chains".
- resistance to herbicides, which "would lead to even more serious
social and environmental impacts, including the destruction of local
flora and impacts on human health."
- higher cellulose content that "would mean reducing the amount
of lignin, the component that provides trees with structural strength,
thus making them more susceptible to suffering serious damage during
wind storms."
The signatories remind country delegates that "the last Conference
of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity (COP-8) adopted
decision VIII/19", which ?recommends Parties to take a precautionary
approach when addressing the issue of genetically modified trees?
and urge them ?to definitely ban GE trees -including fields trials
"because of the serious risks they pose on the Planet's biological
diversity."
Full letter and signatories available at:
http://www.wrm.org.uy/actors/BDC/SBSTTA13/GE_Trees_Campaign.html