Intervention
on GE trees and Agrofuels
21 February 2008, Rome, Italy
This morning
many civil society organizations held a peaceful demonstration outside
the plenary room here in rome. Two statements were read in the plenary
on behalf of many - but not all - civil society organizations present
here. One focused on GE trees and agrofuels, and the other reflecting
on the process at this SBSTTA. The Statement on GE trees and agrofuels
is below, read in the plenary by Ana Filippini from World Rainforest
Movement.
I’m speaking on behalf of many civil
society organizations and Indigenous organizations present here at
SBSTTA.
GE trees are a tremendous threat to forest
biodiversity, and to forest dependent and indigenous communities.
This body is not acknowledging
this. Instead of strengthening the decision on GE trees made at the
last COP, this body is considering weakening the decision, paving
the way to commercialize this deadly and destructive technology.
Commercialization of GE trees
is moving forward rapidly, driven by pulp and paper and biofuels industries.
Use of GE trees will further consolidate a model of monoculture tree
plantations that has already resulted in serious social and environmental
impacts, in many Southern countries.
The issue of GE trees is closely
connected to the issues of agrofuels, climate change and illegal logging,
which must also be addressed by this body with the application of
the precautionary principle.
The new emphasis on wood to produce
agrofuels is creating a massive new demand for wood on top of the
already growing demand. This will result in more logging—mostly
illegal—and more conversion of forests and other ecosystems
to massive monoculture tree plantations of both conventional and GE
trees. All of this will have a detrimental impact on the climate.
The destruction of forests takes
a high toll, not only on wildlife and biodiversity, but on forest-dependent
and indigenous communities and women
A ban on GE trees is critical
because of the enormous threat to biodiversity from contamination
of forests by GE trees. Researchers have found that tree pollen can
travel for over 1,000 kilometers. Addressing GE trees on a case by
case basis is inadequate.
Even GE tree researchers acknowledge
this threat. In an FAO report on GE trees, researchers named contamination
as their second greatest concern about GE trees. Their number one
concern was public opinion.
Social movements and environmental
organizations around the world are mobilizing against GE trees. In
only one week, nearly 150 organizations based in countries where GE
tree field trials are occurring signed on to support a global ban
against the release of GE trees into the environment.
It is now the time for delegates
to acknowledge the concerns of civil society. The decision from COP
8 must be strengthened. There must be a ban on the release of GE trees.