Working
conditions on tree plantations: A health
issue
Very few studies have
been undertaken on the health and safety of tree plantation workers
around the world. In addition, this sector generally tends to
be addressed as part of the larger sector of the forestry industry,
which also encompasses logging and wood harvesting activities
in natural forests.
Nevertheless, a chapter
on the forestry industry in the International Labour Organization
(ILO) Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety includes
some noteworthy data that it is well worth presenting here, focussing
on information related to the sector we are particularly concerned
with.
The ILO recognizes that
forestry work, including work on industrial tree plantations,
is strenuous and dangerous. Because they work outdoors, workers
are exposed to extreme weather conditions: cold, heat, snow, rain
and ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Work often continues even in bad
weather, and night-time work is becoming increasingly frequent
in mechanized operations. Worksites are usually remote and have
poor communications, which makes the rescue and evacuation of
workers difficult in emergency situations. In many countries it
is still common for workers to live for long periods in camps,
isolated from their families and friends.
The difficulties are
aggravated by the nature of the work, which involves the use of
dangerous tools and heavy physical effort. Bad weather, noise
and vibration are common physical risk factors in forestry work
in general. Exposure to physical risks largely varies in accordance
with the type of work and the equipment used. Other factors like
work organization, employment patterns and training also play
an important role in increasing or decreasing the hazards involved
in forestry work.
Manual forestry work
typically implies a heavy physical workload, which in turn leads
to a high energy expenditure, depending on the specific task done
and the pace at which it is carried out. Forestry workers need
to consume a much greater quantity of food than “ordinary” office
workers in order to cope with the demands of their jobs.
Different studies have
revealed that forestry workers are exposed to high rates of illness
in addition to injuries and accidents.
Although few in number
and conducted with small numbers of workers, studies of physiological
indicators of physical strain (heart rate, haematological parameters,
elevated blood enzyme activity) have all concluded that tree planting
is an extremely strenuous occupation in terms of both cardiovascular
and musculoskeletal strain.
Musculoskeletal and
physiological load
Although there is no
epidemiological literature that specifically links tree plantation
work with musculoskeletal problems, the forceful movements involved
in carrying loads, in addition to the range of postures and muscular
work involved in the planting cycle, undoubtedly constitute risk
factors that are heightened by the repetitive nature of the work.
Repetitive strain injuries
continue to be a significant problem. Studies have shown that
between 50% and 80% of machine operators suffer from neck or shoulder
problems. Comparisons of figures tend to be difficult because
injuries develop gradually over long periods of time.
Tree planters also face
numerous biomechanical hazards to the upper limbs, including extreme
flexing and bending of the wrists – such as when grabbing seedlings
from trays – and the sudden impact on hands and arms when the
planting tool hits a hidden rock.
Meanwhile, the manual
piling of logs involves the repeated lifting of heavy weights.
If the proper working technique is not used and the pace is too
fast, there is a very high risk of suffering musculoskeletal injuries.
Carrying heavy loads over long periods of time, as when harvesting
and transporting wood for pulp production, has similar effects.
The total weight carried, the frequency of lifting and the physical
and repetitive nature of the work are factors that contribute
to the muscular strain exerted on the upper limbs.
On the other hand, working
with portable machines such as chainsaws may require an even greater
energy expenditure than manual work, due to their considerable
weight. In fact, the chainsaws used tend to be too large for the
task being carried out. Highly specialized motor-manual tasks
entail a very high risk of musculoskeletal injuries because the
work cycles are short and the specific movements are repeated
many times over.
Working in awkward positions
can result in problems such as lower back pain. One example of
this is the use of an axe to delimb trees that are lying on the
ground, which involves working bent over for long periods of time,
leading to great strain on the lower back area and static work
for the back muscles.
Another potential risk
for those who work planting trees is posed by the unloading of
trays of seedlings from delivery trucks, since these can weigh
between 3 and 4.1 kg each when full. Carrying loads with harnesses
can also lead to back pain, especially if the weight is not well
distributed on the shoulders and around the waist.
It is also important
to point out the muscular load on the lower limbs: walking several
kilometres a day carrying loads over irregular terrain, sometimes
uphill, can rapidly become exhausting work. In addition, this
task implies frequent flexions of the knees and the constant use
of the feet. Most tree planters use their feet to clear away detritus
with a lateral movement before making a hole, and also to apply
weight on the tool’s footrest to plunge it into the soil and to
compact the soil around the seedling once it has been inserted.
In the case of motor-manual
forestry work, workers are also subjected to specific risks due
to the machinery they use. Noise represents a problem when working
with chainsaws or similar equipment. The noise level of the majority
of chainsaws used in normal forestry work is over 100 decibels.
Operators are exposed to this noise level for two to five hours
a day, which can result in hearing loss.
Continuous work in the
outdoors, exposed to the rigours of climate, often without proper
protection against the sun (sunglasses, hats and sunblock) and
against insects, can result in dehydration, sunburn and heat stroke.
Working in a hot climate puts pressure on forest workers who carry
out heavy work. Among other effects, the heart rate increases
to keep body temperature down. Sweating leads to the loss of body
fluids, and heavy work in high temperatures means workers may
need to drink a litre of water an hour to maintain the balance
of these fluids.
In cold climates, the
muscles do not function well, and this increases the risk of suffering
musculoskeletal injuries and accidents. Furthermore, energy expenditure
increases considerably, since it takes a great deal of energy
simply to stay warm.
One of the illnesses
specific to this sector is “tree-planter burnout”, a disorder
provoked by haematological deficiency and characterized by lethargy,
weakness and dizziness, similar to the “sport anaemia” developed
by athletes in training.
There is a high incidence
of premature loss of working capacity and consequently of early
retirement among forestry workers. Chainsaw operators and workers
who manually load logs are prone to hearing loss and back injuries.
A disorder that traditionally affects chainsaw operators is so-called
“white finger” disease, a painful condition provoked by the vibration
of the saw which can leave them unable to work: the fingers turn
white and become numb, making it impossible to carry out more
delicate tasks. The disorder can also cause tingling and pain
in both arms, especially at night.
On the other hand, the
long work days, commuting and strict quality control to which
tree planters are subjected, together with the demands posed by
piece work (a widespread practice among tree plantation subcontractors)
can affect the worker’s physiological and psychological equilibrium
and result in chronic fatigue and stress.
Accidents and
injuries
The setting in which
tree plantation work is done makes workers particularly prone
to trips and falls. Forestry work can result in injuries to almost
every part of the body, but injuries tend to be concentrated in
the legs, feet, back and hands, roughly in that order. Cuts and
open wounds are the most common type of injury among chainsaw
operators, while bruises tend to predominate in other work areas,
although there is also the risk of fractures and dislocations
as well as injuries associated with forceful movements or caused
by cutting scraps or debris.
Ranking of the most
frequent tree-planting accidents grouped by body parts affected
(percentages based on 122 reports by 48 subjects in Québec, Canada)
Rank |
Body
part |
%
total |
Related
causes |
1 |
Knees |
14 |
Falls,
contact with tool, soil compaction |
2 |
Skin |
12 |
Equipment
contact, biting and stinging insects, sunburn, chapping
|
3 |
Eyes |
11 |
Insects,
insect repellent, twigs |
4 |
Back |
10 |
Frequent
bending, load carrying |
4 |
Feet |
10 |
Soil
compaction, blisters |
5 |
Hands |
8 |
Chapping,
scratches from contact with soil |
6 |
Legs |
7 |
Falls,
contact with tool |
7 |
Wrists |
6 |
Hidden
rocks |
8 |
Ankles |
4 |
Trips
and falls, hidden obstacles, contact with tool |
9 |
Other |
18 |
|
Another study on occupational
safety on tree plantations in Nigeria revealed that on average,
workers suffered two accidents a year, while in a given year,
between one in four and one in ten workers suffered a serious
accident.
Two situations which
further heighten the already high risk of serious accidents during
the harvesting stage on tree plantations are “hung-up” trees and
wind-blown timber. Wind-blow tends to produce timber under tension,
which requires specially adapted cutting techniques. Hung-up trees
are those that have been severed at the stump but do not fall
to the ground because their crowns have become entangled with
other trees. Hung-up trees are so dangerous that in some countries
they are referred to as “widow-makers” due to the large number
of deaths they cause. Bringing these trees safely down to the
ground requires the use of tools like winches and turning hooks.
However, a highly dangerous practice known as “driving” is used
in some countries, through which other trees are felled so as
to fall onto the hung-up tree and thereby bring it down.
In many countries, manual
workers work together with or close to chainsaw or machine operators.
Machine operators are seated in cabins or use hearing protection
and good protective equipment, but in most cases, manual workers
wear no protective gear whatsoever. They also do not maintain
a safe distance from the machines, which results in an extremely
high risk of accidents and hearing loss for unprotected workers.
The other side of the
coin with regard to mechanization is the emerging problem of neck
and shoulder strain injuries among machine operators, which can
be as incapacitating as serious accidents.
The risk of an accident
varies not only in accordance with the technology used and the
degree of exposure involved in the job, but with other factors
as well. In almost all cases for which data are available, there
is a very significant difference between segments of the workforce.
Full-time, professional forestry workers directly employed by
a forest enterprise are far less affected than those who are self-employed
or employed by contractors.
Transportation on highways
also accounts for a large number of serious accidents, especially
in tropical countries.
Chemical hazards
The trend towards mechanization
of forestry work is increasing. During maintenance and repair
operations, the hands of machine operators are exposed to lubricants,
hydraulic oils and fuel oils, which can cause irritant dermatitis.
The portable machines
used in the forestry industry are powered by two-stroke engines,
in which lubricating oil is mixed with gasoline. Generally, around
30% of the gasoline consumed by a chainsaw engine is emitted unburned.
The main components of exhaust emissions are hydrocarbons, which
are typical components of gasoline, as well as additives like
organic lead compounds, alcohols and ethers. Some of the exhaust
gases are formed during combustion, and the main toxic product
among them is carbon monoxide. Fuels also represent a fire hazard.
Forestry workers are
also exposed to chemical products like pesticides, insecticides
and herbicides. On tree plantations, pesticides are used to control
fungi, insects and rodents. Products used include phenoxy herbicides,
glyphosate or triazines, as well as insecticides such as organophosphorus
compounds, organochlorine compounds or synthetic pyredroids. In
nurseries, dithiocarbamates are used regularly to protect softwood
seedlings against pine fungus.
The methods used to
apply pesticides include aerial spraying, application from tractor-driven
equipment, knapsack spraying, ultra low volume (ULV) spraying
and the use of sprayers connected to brush saws. The risk of exposure
is similar to that in other pesticide applications. The symptoms
caused by excessive exposure to pesticides vary greatly depending
on the compound applied, but occupational exposure to pesticides
most often causes skin disorders. Personal protection equipment
tends to be very hot and to cause excessive sweating.
Biological hazards
People who work outdoors,
as in the case of tree plantation workers, are exposed to health
hazards from animals, plants, bacteria, viruses, etc. to a greater
degree than the rest of the population. Allergic reactions to
plants and wood products, especially pollen, are very common.
There is also the possibility of injuries during processing operations
(for example, from thorns, spines, bark) and from secondary infections,
which cannot always be avoided and can cause additional complications.
Another potential hazard
is being bitten by poisonous snakes, as well as the possibility
of a life-threatening allergic reaction to the antidote used in
such cases.
Social and psychological
factors
The health and safety
situation in tree plantation work depends on a range of factors
such as stand and terrain conditions, infrastructure, climate,
technology, work methods, work organization, economic situation,
contracting arrangements, worker accommodation, and education
and training. But social and psychological factors also have an
impact. In the context of forestry work, these factors include
job satisfaction and security, the mental workload, susceptibility
and response to stress, the capacity to cope with perceived risks,
work pressure, overtime and fatigue, the need to endure adverse
environmental conditions, social isolation in work camps with
separation from families, work organization, and teamwork.
Traditionally, forestry
workers have come from rural areas and have felt a sense of identification
with the independent, outdoors nature of the work. However, modern
forestry operations no longer fit such expectations. Those who
are unable to adapt to mechanization, subcontracting and the rapid
technological and structural changes in forestry work since the
early 1980s are often marginalized. Many new entrants still come
ill-prepared to the job.
Social and psychological
factors are likely to play a major role in determining the impact
of risk and stress. A German study revealed that around 11% of
forestry industry accidents were attributed to stress, and another
third to fatigue, routine, risk taking and lack of experience.
Forestry workers generally
consider risk-taking to be part of their job. Where this tendency
is pronounced, risk compensation can undermine efforts to improve
work safety. In these situations, workers adjust their behaviour
and return to what they perceive as an acceptable level of risk.
For example, this may be part of the explanation for the limited
effectiveness of personal protective equipment (PPE). Knowing
that they are protected by cut-proof trousers and boots, workers
go faster, work with the machine closer to their body and take
short cuts, thereby violating safety regulations because they
“take too long to follow”. Normally, risk compensation seems to
be partial. There are probably differences among individuals and
groups of workers, and reward factors are probably important to
trigger risk compensation. Such rewards could include reduced
discomfort (such as when not wearing warm protective clothing
in a hot climate) or financial benefits (such as in piece-rate
systems), but social recognition in a “macho” culture is also
a conceivable motive.
Among the most common
stress factors in the forestry industry are high work speed, repetitive
and boring work, heat, an overload or underload of work in unbalanced
work crews, young or old workers trying to achieve sufficient
earnings on low piece-work rates, isolation from workmates, family
and friends, and a lack of privacy in camps.
The transformation of
forestry work that has drastically increased productivity has
also increased stress levels and reduced overall welfare in the
sector.
Two types of workers
are especially prone to stress: harvester operators and contractors.
Operators of sophisticated harvesters are in a multiple-stress
situation, due to the short work cycles, the quantity of information
they need to absorb and the large number of quick decisions they
need to make. Harvesters are significantly more demanding than
more traditional machines like skidders, loaders and forwarders.
In addition to machine handling, the operator is usually also
responsible for machine maintenance, planning and skid track design
as well as bucking, scaling and other quality aspects that are
closely monitored by the company and that have a direct impact
on pay.
Quite commonly, the
operators of these machines are also their owners and work as
small contractors, which can lead to added strain. This is particularly
due to the financial risk entailed, which can involve loans of
up to USD 1 million in a highly volatile and competitive market.
Among this group, working weeks often exceed 60 hours.
There are significant
differences between the various segments of the forestry workforce
in terms of the form of employment, which have a direct impact
on workers’ exposure to safety and health hazards. The share of
forestry workers directly employed by forestry companies has been
declining. More and more work is done through contractors (that
is, relatively small, geographically mobile service firms employed
for a particular job), which may be owner-operators (either single-person
firms or family businesses) or may have a number of employees.
Both the contractors and their employees often have very unstable
employment. Because contractors are under pressure to cut costs
in a very competitive market, they sometimes resort to illegal
practices such as moonlighting and hiring undocumented immigrants.
Accidents and health complaints tend to be more frequent among
workers employed by contractors.
Contract labour has
also contributed to increasing the high rate of turnover in the
forestry workforce, further exacerbating the lack of qualified
workers. The lack of structured training and short periods of
experience due to high turnover or seasonal work are decisive
factors in the significant health and safety problems facing the
forestry sector.
The dominant wage system
in forestry continues to be piece-rates (in other words, payment
based exclusively on output). This payment system tends to lead
to a faster pace of work, which is believed to contribute to increasing
the number of accidents. An undeniable side effect is that earnings
decrease once workers reach a certain age, because their physical
abilities decline.
Wages in the forestry
sector are usually much lower than the industrial average in the
same country. Employees, the self-employed and contractors often
try to compensate for this fact by working 50 or even 60 hours
a week, which increases strain on the body and the risk of accidents
because of fatigue. Organized labour and trade unions are rather
rare in this sector. The traditional problems of organizing geographically
dispersed, mobile, sometimes seasonal workers have been compounded
by the fragmentation of the workforce into small contractor firms.
Labour inspections are
rarely carried out in most countries. In the absence of institutions
to protect workers’ rights, forestry workers typically have little
knowledge of their rights, including those stipulated in existing
health and safety regulations, and therefore face great difficulties
in exercising them.
The information presented
in this article was extracted from the ILO Encyclopaedia of Occupational
Health and Safety, Fourth Edition, Volume III, Part X, Industries
Based On Biological Resources, Forestry. http://www.ilo.org/encyclopaedia/?d&nd=857200345&prevDoc=857000002