South
Africa: A visit to Komatiland Forests
industrial tree monocultures
In November 2007, several representatives
from World Rainforest Movement visited Komatiland Forests' operations
at Brooklands in Mpumalanga province in South Africa.
Under a photograph of J. Brooke Shires,
who planted the first eucalyptus and acacia trees at Brooklands
in 1876, we listened to a company presentation. Komatiland is
a parastatal company managing a total of about 128,000 hectares
of mainly pine plantations. The trees are grown on a 28 to 30
year rotation for saw logs. Komatiland employs 2,400 people with
a further 1,200 people employed on a contract basis, we were told.
The Komatiland plantations at Brooklands cover an area of just
over 12,000 hectares. The company uses a horse harvesting system
on about one-third of its land at Brooklands.
The company has been certified by SGS
Qualifor under the Forest Stewardship Council certification system
since 1997. A Komatiland official told us that there are four
stages of certification: unknowingly non-compliant; knowingly
non-compliant; knowingly compliant; and unknowingly compliant.
In these days of corporate greenwash, this part of the presentation
was refreshingly honest. "I'm buggered if I know where we
are," he said, laughing. "Somewhere between two and
three." This was a staff member of an FSC-certified company
admitting publicly that Komatiland was not fully compliant with
FSC standards. "There are problems with all operations. We
are not perfect. You will be able to find problems in every one
of our plantation units." He said this to an audience that
he knew was critical of both industrial tree plantations and FSC
certification.
Winnie Overbeek asked about land rights
and conflicts over land. "That sounds like a very European
question," came the reply. Overbeek explained that he has
worked for more than a decade in Brazil supporting the Tupinikim
and Guarani Indigenous Peoples in their struggle for land in the
area occupied by Aracruz Cellulose's plantations and that his
question was based on this experience. Undaunted, the company
representative continued. "South Africa is a very unique
country", he explained. "There are no indigenous people
in South Africa according to FSC standards. Apartheid happened
and there are lots of land claims. All plantations and farms have
land claims. That doesn't mean that they are valid land claims."
All of which sounds remarkably similar to the arguments that Aracruz
used, before the Brazilian Ministry of Justice ruled in favour
of the Tupinikim and Guarani (see WRM Bulletin 122, September
2007).
In 2007, Komatiland lost about 17,000
hectares of plantations to fire. "Global warming is making
things worse," said the Komatiland official. "For example,
pine beetles are attacking native forest trees. No one knows what
will happen next. We're in for some changes and we're scared of
it."
Wally Menne of the TimberWatch coalition
pushed home the point that although the company is called Komatiland
Forests, this is a misnomer, because Komatiland's forestry operations
consist of large scale industrial tree plantations.
After the presentation, the company
took us to look at some of its plantations. We drove through Komatiland's
pine and eucalyptus monocultures. We saw huge areas of clearcuts
and burnt areas of plantation. We drove past the company-built
accommodation for workers - rows of small, crudely built terraced
bungalows with tin roofs and large numbers painted on the doors.
In its assessment of Komatiland, SGS states that the company directly
employs only 1,729 people. Driving through the plantations and
clearcuts we saw very few workers.
We stopped on a ridge, with lush green
grassland on one side of the track and a scene of complete destruction
on the other. Every living thing had been cut and scraped away,
leaving what looked like a brown moonscape. We got out and walked
past piles of logs, some of which were marked with SGS's forest
management and chain of custody number (SGS-FM-COC-0068). In the
distance a machine was picking up logs and leaving them in neat
piles.
In the company's presentation we'd been
told that 30 per cent of Komatiland's land is open, and that since
1994, the area of plantations at Brooklands had been reduced from
10,000 hectares to 9,000 hectares. We were told that there was
no planting within 20 metres of streams. There was a stream flowing
just next to the clearcut. Eucalyptus and pine trees were growing
right up to the stream bank.
We saw a log extraction operation using
horses. Komatiland told us that using horses damages the soil
less and employs more people than mechanised log extraction. The
operation that we saw was on a slope that was in any case far
too steep to use machines. It looked like brutally hard work.
Four men were working with three horses. The horses pulled the
logs one at a time down the slope. The men then had to unfasten
the chains from the log and pull the horses back up the slope.
Meanwhile the managers watched them from the bottom of the slope.
One of them had brought his dog with him to work.
During the company's
presentation, we had been told that "Apartheid happened"
in South Africa. Yet every worker we saw was black. And every
manager we saw was white. In Komatiland's plantations, it seems,
apartheid still exists.
By Chris Lang, http://chrislang.org