Palm oil expansion
for agrofuels: Burning all hope of stabilising the climate?
Two years ago, 5.3 million
hectares across Indonesia were engulfed in flames in the worst fire
season since 1997/98. Haze blanketed large parts of South-east Asia,
hiding additional peat and forest fires in Malaysia. Over 75,000
fires burnt across Sumatra and Borneo. Peat expert, Professor Florian
Siegert helped to analyse details from satellite images and concluded:
“Most fires were set to clear land for plantations. Those burns
often run out of control because the forests have already been damaged
by illegal logging” (1).
Similar fires now occur every year, though their scale varies depending
on how long and dry the dry season is. Palm oil has become the main
driver of peatland destruction, followed by tree plantations for
pulp and paper.
According to Siegert, the
carbon dioxide released by the 2006 peat and forest fires accounted
for up to 15% of all global carbon dioxide emissions that year.
This figure, however, gives only a glimpse of the true scale of
the climate impacts associated with palm oil in South-east Asia.
South-east Asia peatlands
account for 60% of the world's tropical peatlands and hold around
42 billion tonnes of carbon. Globally, peatlands play a vital role
in stabilising the climate: As long as peat remains undisturbed
and does not dry up as a result of climate change, it represents
a permanent carbon store. Peat formation is one of the earth's ways
of removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and thus an important
'global thermostat'. There is strong evidence that South-east Asia's
peat swamps played a vital role in preventing more extreme and rapid
global warming at the end of the last ice age. Nobody knows exactly
why the warming at that time did not run out of control and cause
a mass extinction, as had happened tens of millions of years ago.
After all, warming automatically results in more carbon dioxide
being released into the atmosphere, particularly by the oceans.
Much of that carbon dioxide must have been absorbed by soil and
vegetation and we know that peat accumulation accelerated at the
time, when those peatlands were much larger, due to lower sea level
(2). Left intact, we could expect
South-east Asia's peat forests to absorb some of the carbon dioxide
which has already been emitted by fossil fuel burning and to mitigate
climate change. Their destruction is thus a double whammy to the
earth's climate: Once the peat is drained and logged, all of the
carbon in the peat will 'oxidise', which means they will react with
oxygen to form carbon dioxide. This process can take several decades,
but it is greatly speeded up by fires. There is little hope that
even a catastrophic 2oC warming could be avoided if all
the 42 billion tonnes of carbon in Indonesia's and Malaysia's peat
goes into the atmosphere, regardless of any measures taken to phase
out fossil fuels and end deforestation. Even worse, at a time of
catastrophic climate change, one of the few ways in which the planet
can eventually stabilise its temperature is being destroyed, putting
the future of all life at even greater risk.
Already, 48% of the original
27 million hectares of peatlands have been intensively logged and
drained and 3.7 have been completely destroyed. In theory, it should
be possible to restore what remains of the drained peat, through
re-flooding and reforestation. Several NGOs have begun a demonstration
project, although anecdotal evidence suggests that this is not very
successful due to a lack of community involvement. In reality, however,
we can expect virtually all of the remaining peatlands to be destroyed,
barring a u-turn in Europe's and other countries' bioenergy policies
and the Malaysian and Indonesian governments' policies of promoting
monocultures for agrofuel exports. In the past, Europe's use of
rapeseed oil for biodiesel has been one of the main causes of palm
oil expansion, since the food and cosmetics industry has responded
by switching from rapeseed to palm oil. Palm oil use for heat and
power, has been another serious factor. In future, it is likely
that more palm oil will be used directly for biodiesel: Several
large biodiesel refineries are being built specifically to use palm
oil, including the world's biggest one, which Neste Oil is constructing
in Singapore, while the US and Australia are increasing their imports
for agroenergy.
According to Wetlands International,
at least 15% of Malaysian and 25% of Indonesian oil palm plantations
are now on peat. In Indonesia, over half of all new concessions
for such plantations have been granted on peatlands. In Malaysia,
the state government of Sarawak has recently allocated 400,000 hectares
of peat swamp forests for plantations, mostly for palm oil
(3). Peat forests are being targeted
not least because virtually all of Sumatra's and most of Borneo's
rainforests have been destroyed, hence the less accessible wood
in peat swamps becomes attractive to loggers. Extra profits from
the timber make oil palm plantations significantly more attractive
and in some cases, palm oil and logging firms are part of the same
company. Furthermore, government policies which promote palm oil
for export, largely to serve Europe's growing demand for agrofuels,
make it easy to obtain concessions to convert forests.
Peat forests are not the
only frontier for Indonesia's palm oil expansion. Indonesia's last
large continuous rainforests, in Aceh and West Papua are facing
similar destruction. The Indonesian government has designated 9.3
million hectares of West Papua's forest for 'conversion', mostly
for palm oil. So far, large concessions have been awarded but there
are as yet relatively few productive oil palm plantations
(4). As in Borneo and Sumatra, logging
and plantation development go hand in West Papua, too.
According to Watch Indonesia!,
40 million people in Indonesia depend directly on the forest for
their livelihoods. They are today paying the price for a false 'climate
solution' which, instead of mitigating climate change, is one of
the most effective ways of ensuring, that warming will run out of
control.
By Almuth Ernsting, Biofuelwatch,
http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk
, e-mail:
almuthbernstinguk@yahoo.co.uk
References:
1.
www.berlinonline.de/berliner-zeitung/archiv/.bin/dump.fcgi/2006/1102/wissenschaft/0062/index.html
2. “A record of Late Pleistocene and Holocene carbon accumulation
and climate change form an equatorial peat bog (Kalimantan, Indonesia):
implications for past, present and future carbon dynamics”, Susan
Page et al, Journal of Quarternary Science, Vol 19, Issue 2, 27th
September 2004
3. “Malaysian palm oil: green gold or green wash?”, Friends of the
Earth, October 2008,
www.foei.org/en/publications/pdfs/malaysian-palm-oil-report
4. “Forests in Papua: Data and Facts”, Marianne Klute, Watch Indonesia!,
26.1.08,
www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/docs/papua_article.pdf
