Women’s
Land Tenure Security and Community-Based Forest Management
In Indonesia, the
western part of Java -Halimun- is well known by its high biodiversity
and cultural richness. In terms of community-based forest resource
management systems, indigenous and local peoples of Halimun possess
centuries of farming and knowledge about the tropical rainforests.
They utilize the surrounding forest and land for various uses in
models of swidden cultivation (huma), rice field (sawah), garden
(kebon), mixed tree garden (talun) and various types of forests
(such as Leuweung Titipan, Leuweung Tutupan and Leuweung Bukaan).
These models are managed as one integrated system by men and women.
It is well noticed that men and women contribute to their family’s
welfare, often in complementary ways, and each type of contribution
is indispensable, especially within poor families. With regards
to food security, women make a bigger contribution to their families
as a whole than men, because they are more involved in swidden cultivation
and rice production.
Since 1924, under
the Dutch colonial time, a part of the Halimun ecosystem area was
set up as protected forest area to be changed in 1979 into nature
reserve, and again in 1992 into national park up to nowadays. On
the other hand, Halimun is also a big source of state income. Government
tree plantations (since 1978); large scale estates of tea, cacao,
rubber (1970s); and gold and other mineral mining (1990s), have
been disrupting the ecosystem. Moreover, all those “development
projects” have restricted and even more ended peoples’
access to and control over livelihood resources (land and other
forest resources), entailing the disappearance of traditional knowledge,
particularly that of local and indigenous women.
“Since the
forest was cut down and converted into pine garden, the water quality
for sawah [rice field] is no longer good. Apparently , this kind
of water quality is not suitable for growing the local variety of
paddy.” (Mrs. Annah). “Formerly, we could easily find
ki beling [medicinal plant] surrounding here, but now, we should
walk far to the Cibareno river to look for it.” (Mrs. Surni,
a midwife)
In response to
the many external pressures, environmental damages, constriction
or even loss of local access to and control over the land, women
from Malasari and Mekarsari villages work harder than before to
provide food for their families by, among other:
- Becoming daily
poorly paid agricultural-wage laborers (buruh tani), earning US$
0.7 – 1.4 a day;
- Doing ngepak (arrangement between landless peasant women and land-owners
for planting and harvesting paddy, earning two bundles of rice for
each ten that they plant);
- Doing maro (local share-cropping, by keeping 50% of the harvest);
- “Illegally” cultivating small parcels of the “state”
land managed by the State Forestry Company Perum Perhutani;
- Carrying out women’s “voluntary” day-care to
support other women who would like to do ngepak or buruh agricultural
works;
Whichever the combination
of women's and their family members' efforts, however, the food
supply often still does not meet the families’ yearly requirements:
“I never sell the paddy that I cultivate. It is not enough
even for my family,” said Mrs. Arti. “If there is no
land, there is no food. If there is little land, there is little
food,” expressed Mrs. Minarsih.
Malasari and Mekarsari
women’s access to and control over land and other forest resources
are insecure, and their families have no legal rights, protection
and guarantees regarding the future use of the land. The general
consequence is that, since the people are forced to cultivate in
this “legal vacuum”, it is indeed very difficult for
them to receive support and assistance. As a result, women and their
children suffer most under hunger, malnutrition, domestic violence,
and violations of other rights including the right to health, education,
the freedom of speech and gathering.
In order to guarantee
the sustainability and development of community-based forest resources
management system, the certainty of independent rights in which
that system is developed by Indigenous Peoples and local communities
is required. The certainty of peoples’ --especially women’s--
independent rights should be adopted in natural resources related
policies which acknowledge that the main actors in the natural resources
management consist of women and men, with their different respective
needs, interests, priorities and restrictions. The voice of Mrs
Uun as one of women elders in Malasari village: “We have defended
our land before, and we will defend it again” should be heeded!
In wrapping up
this paper, in terms of manifested women’s independent rights
on land and other forest resources, it is very important for us
to define and bring into reality the issue of how women could improve
their own life --for instance, their own prosperity level in terms
of food quality, clothing, health (especially their reproductive
health), education, security and safety feelings as well as leisure
time for taking a rest and doing other private activities-- as a
consequence of their participation in the many efforts to achieve
a better life (welfare condition). These are basic and important
conditions which should be highly considered by us as outsiders,
such as governments (including policy makers), local NGOs and international
cooperation agencies (including international NGOs) as well, when
we plan to design “community-based” forest or other
natural resource management projects in a participatory manner.
Who exactly gets direct benefits from the project? Is it the women?
Or, does the project even create overburdens for women? It is crucial
to further analyze critical questions about how access to (and control
over?) the land and other production factors provides direct positive
impacts on the whole of women’s lives both in domestic and
public domains.